订阅投稿登陆
正在加载中...


最新目录
现代国家及其治理
本刊特稿
燕继荣
发布时间:2015-5-6  发布人:本站  源自:本站
    

  基金项目:北京市社会科学联合会、北京市中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心重大项目“中国现代国家治理体系构建研究”

  作者:燕继荣,北京大学政府管理学院政治学教授,北京大学国家治理协同创新中心研究员,北京100871

  doi:10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2015.05.02

  [摘要]什么是“现代国家”?“现代国家”与“古代国家”在国家治理方面有什么区别?本文引用现代化研究的一般结论和国家理论与历史研究的最新成果,说明“现代国家”的含义,阐述“现代国家”治理的基本原理和特点。本文认为,“现代国家”包含两重含义:一是国际政治意义上实现领土和治权统一的国家;二是政治发展意义上确立法治与民主问责制的国家。从政治发展的意义上说,国家治理者(统治者)本身是否受到宪法和法律的有效约束,是衡量国家现代与否的关键性指标;在“主权和治权分开”的基础上实行“有限责任制”——责任政府依法而治——是“现代国家”治理的主要方式。

  [关键词]法治;责任政府;现代国家;国家治理

  [中图分类号]D035[文献标识码]A[文章编号]1006-0863(2015)05-0012-05
 

  [参考文献]

  [1][法]皮埃尔·卡蓝默.破碎的民主——试论治理的革命[M].庄晨燕译.北京:三联书店,2005.6.

  [2]马克思恩格斯全集(第1卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1956.82.

  [3][美]罗伯特·达尔.民主及其批评者[M].佟德志译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.3-4,22,443.

  [4]荣剑、杨逢春.民主论[M].上海人民出版社,1989.2.

  [5]Waldo,Dwight.Development of Theory of Democratic Administration.The American Political Science Review,1952,46(1).

  [6][美]希尔斯曼.美国是如何治理的[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988.642-643,25.

  [7][美]奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].陈郁等译.上海人民出版社,1995.40 .

  [8]Neal Riemer. Creative Breakthroughs in Politics. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publisher Inc,1996.

  [9]张成福.开放政府论[J].中国人民大学学报,2014(3).

  [10][美]罗伯特·达尔.多元主义民主的困境[M],长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.125.

  [11][美]弗雷德雷克森.公共行政的精神[M],张成福译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.30-31.

  [12][美]迈克尔·桑德尔.民主的不满:美国在寻求一种公共哲学[M].曾纪茂译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2012.379.

  [13]马克思恩格斯全集(第46卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1956.197.

  [14][美]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道[M].余逊达,陈旭东译.上海三联书店,2000.51.

 

On the Social Foundation of Democratic Governance

Dang Xiuyun

  [Abstract]Democratic governance is a kind of public governance mechanism or rule to ensure and achieve participation, transparency, legality, reliability, validity and fairness of the Public governance process and governance system. Democratic governance has a positive meaning and value that can achieve the public response and broad participation, safeguard and promote the public interest, protect and realize civil rights and establish public value. In today's social environment of Complexity, diversity, instability and competition, democratic governance faces an enormous gap between ideal and reality, facing a series of unprecedented difficulties, pressures and challenges. As an important mechanism and way to promote better human social ideal, the crucial bases to achieve social democratic governance are to achieve effective democratic system, efficient administrative system, moral and noble citizens, goodness of law and the rule of law, market mechanism as the core and foundation of economic system, and highly social autonomy and self-government.

  [Keywords]democratic governance, public governance, public interests

  [Author]Dang Xiuyun is Professor at School of Management, MinZu University of China. Beijing 100081




关于杂志  |  联系我们  |     |  网站地图
版权所有:中国行政管理杂志社 京ICP备:06058857号  京公网安备:110102004816
本网站所有内容属中国行政管理杂志社所有,未经许可不得转载

(自2013年5月16日起计数)